Homophily in dating site, bibliography
The general reasoning for this was that people who have more in common with each other are able to communicate more comfortably with each other.
The relation between these terms and homophily is the tendency to be attracted to what is similar.
Status homophily are ascribed statuses such as race, gender, and age. Heterophily is especially prevalent when discussing the diffusion of innovations theory.
Heterophily also may be mentioned in areas such as homogamyexogamyand endogamy. Still, Rogers believed that heterophily has such an impact on the diffusion of innovation theory that he stated in his book that "the very nature of diffusion demands that at least some degree of heterophily be present between the two participants".
This creates strong ties within the group. According to Rogers, "Heterophily, the mirror opposite of homophily, is non jew dating jewish mandala as the degree to which pairs of individuals who interact are different in certain attributes".
This is because he believed homophily to be a more beneficial agent in communication.
He believed that weak ties could be possibly more effective than strong ties in reaching individuals. In the working environment[ edit ] The concept of heterophily has been mentioned pertaining to working environments and the relationships within them.
Homogamy and endogamy may be a result of cultural practices or personal preference. Heterophily is often discussed with its opposite, homophily when analyzing how relationships form between people.
These may include, but are not limited to: Endogamy's antithesis, exogamy, is marriage only outside of a particular group. The diffusion of innovation theory itself is used to explain how new or innovative ideas are spread throughout a system composed of individuals.
They see the removal of the barrier of gender as a departure from the homophily of peer friendships. Through his work Rogers showed that heterophilious networks were better able to spread innovations.
As a result, the concept of heterophily has been studied to try to improve relationships between individuals in the workplace.
Rather it is often used in conjunction with other similar terms that define attraction. In fact, according to The logic of social bias: Later, scholars such as Paul Burton have drawn connections between modern Social Network Analysis as practiced by Mark Granovetter in his theory of weak ties and the work of Georg Simmel.
In social and intimate relationships[ edit ] Heterophily is usually not a term found often by itself. To fully understand heterophily, it is important to understand the meaning and importance of homophily.
The effect and occurrence of heterophily is also analyzed in intimate relationships. The theory of homophily states that "similarity breeds connection.
Rogers saw heterophily between individuals as "one of the most distinctive problems in the communication". Diffusion of Innovations was the book written by Everett Rogers where he first termed heterophily.
Homogamy refers to the tendency of individuals to marry others that share similarities with each other, while endogamy is the practice of marrying within a specific group. The structural demography of heterophily by Ray Reagans, the first component is the intrinsic level of interpersonal attraction due to homophily.
Mark Granovetter defined the strength of a tie as a "combination of the amount of time, the emotional intensity, the intimacy, and the reciprocal services which characterize the tie".
Burton found that Simmel's notion of "the stranger" is equivalent to Granovetter's weak tie in that both can bridge homophilious networks, turning them into one larger heterophilious network.